Функции разделительных вопросов в судебном дискурсе

• Номер работы:
  421478
• Раздел:
  Все работы   →   Части дипломной   →   Английский язык
• Год добавления:
  28.11.2016 г.
• Объем работы:
  31 стр.
• Содержание:
  Table of Contents
  
  1. Functional classification of tag questions by J. Holmes 3
  2. Functional classification of tag questions by S. Hoffman 4
  3. Functional classification of tag questions by J. Algeo 5
  4. Table of examples and their analysis 7
  Conclusion 20
  References 22
  Appendix 1. List of practical resources 24
  
  
• Выдержка из работы:
  Некоторые тезисы из работы по теме Функции разделительных вопросов в судебном дискурсе
  1. Functional classification of tag questions by J. Holmes
  
  The question of functions of tag questions used in the court discourse is examined in the scientific researches of many foreign and Russian scientists, for example, M. Farcasiu , S. Berk-Seligson , D. Cameron , E.B. Balcha , S. Hale , N.V. Kozhedub , O.G. Shevchenko , etc.
  Some of researchers try to organize a strict classification of the main functions of tag questions. The most prominent functional classifications belong to J. Holmes, S. Hoffman and J. Algeo. Thus, in the present research we will examine tag questions in the court discourse according to their classifications.
  J. Holmes suggests distinguishing five main functions of tag questions used in the court discourse:
  - epistemic modal tags / informational function;
  - epistemic modal tags / confirmatory function;
  - facilitative tags;
  - softening tags;
  - challenging tags.
  ..............
  3. Functional classification of tag questions by J. Algeo
  
  Classification of J. Algeo includes only five functions of tag questions:
  - informational function;
  - confirmatory function;
  - punctuational function;
  - peremptory function;
  - aggressive function .
  Informational function of tag question has the same features as this function in the classifications of J. Holmes and S. Hoffman analyzed above. Using such tag question, the speaker has an idea about the statement preceding the tag, but asks for information without presuming to know what the addressee will say.
  Confirmatory tag question is similar to that in the two given above classifications. The speaker using confirmatory question does not seek information but draws the addressee into the conversation, asks for confirmation of what the speaker has said.
  Punctuation function in Algeo’s classification is close to Hoffman’s attitudinal function. Such tag questions are used in order to point up what the speaker has said. It is the vocal equivalent of an exclamation or emphasis point. For example:
  .......